A Costa Rica Blog  

Bridge over the Rio Blanco

Bridge over the Rio Blanco near the proposed dam site

Yesterday afternoon I received a surprise visit from Miguel Viquez, an Environmental Planner for the new hydroelectric dam proposed for the Rio Savegre named Proyecto Hidroeléctrico Savegre, or PH Savegre.

Part of this project includes a tunnel that will likely run beneath Hills of Portalon, and directly under my lot. The current phase of the planning includes taking core samples at various sites along two possible tunnel routes, and last year ICE indicated they wanted to drill a core on my property but, at that time, were not exactly sure where the drilling rig would be located.

Yesterday, Sr. Viquez arrived with a map showing planned locations of the core drilling sites. Since taking a core sample to a depth of 300 meters takes around three months, I had some questions — one of which was about the noise created by a diesel drilling rig near my house — and Sr. Viquez invited me on a tour to visit an operating drill site.

What started as an unplanned afternoon turned into a pleasant drive up the Rio Savegre, an interesting conversation with Sr. Viquez, and a visit to the dam site. While there I met with Nancy Ramírez Castro, a Geological Engineer who works for ICE on the PH Savegre project, along with other engineers and a drilling rig crew.

discussing the map

Miguel Viguez (center) and Nancy Ramírez (right)
discuss plans to drill a core sample in my yard.

This was not the first time that I had met Sr. Viquez and Sra. Ramírez. Both had attended an ICE community meeting held in Rana Roja last year, where a through overview of the project was presented to those who were interested. It was good to meet with them again in a field setting, and get to know them and their ideas a little better. Both of these people have a lot of enthusiasm for the project, and see it benefiting the local area and Costa Rica in many ways.

After that meeting in July of 2009, as I wrote in some earlier notes before I started this blog: The current investigation phase is due to be completed in 2011 and, if things proceed as planned, funding will be needed from the legislature by 2014. Once funded, machinery and other equipment will be purchased by 2020. After that, construction of the dam, the hydro tunnel, and the electrical generating plant in Pasito will begin.

Stacks and stacks of core sample boxes await transportation to San Jose.

Stacks and stacks of flat core sample boxes
await transportation to San Jose.

I was impressed by the amount of road, electrical, Internet, and other community development that ICE has undertaken along the route next to the Savegre river, including a large futbol plaza in Silencio and several new bridges along the way.

When I asked about the impact of diverting a six-meter tube of water away from the Savegre river, I was told that during the rainy season the impact would be negligible but that during the dry season there would be a noticeable difference which would probably affect river rafting tours.

I was also reminded that there are a lot of quebradas and other tributaries into the Rio Blanco and Savegre rivers below the dam site, and these will continue to feed the river as they currently do. I guess this will mitigate the impact some, but there will obviously be changes to the ecosystems both above and below the dam.

A box containing one part of a core sample.

A box containing various sections of a core sample.

While looking at some of the core samples taken, Sra. Ramírez mentioned that after the samples have been examined, most of them will be disposed of. However, some of them will be retained indefinitely in a warehouse in San Jose.

Next we crossed the Rio Blanco and drove a short way to a core drilling site, which was about half way between the bridge and where the dam will be located.

If anyone has taken a rafting trip down the Savegre River, you likely entered the water at an old bridge on Rio Blanco, about eight kilometers beyond Rifiki Lodge. The old cement and steel bridge is quite distinctive, and if you’ve seen it you will recognize it, but maybe not in the small photo at the top of this article (that photo was taken last summer when I went rafting with some clients).

An ICE drilling rig site overlooking the Rio Blanco (you can see the old bridge over the river in the background)

An ICE drilling rig site overlooking the Rio Blanco (look closely and
you can see the old bridge over the river in the background)

Each drilling site needs around 150 square meters for the rig, a small shelter for the crew, and a separate shelter to protect the emerging core sections from rain and sun.

In addition to the core, other sampling is done at each site. A seismic survey is done using small explosive charges. Just enough explosive is used to obtain a “map” down to the drilling depth, and is similar to geological imaging done at other types of exploration sites such as gas, oil, and paleontological digs.

This drilling rig has caterpillar tracks, while others have an augur propulsion or even normal wheels

This drilling rig has caterpillar tracks, while others have an
augur propulsion and some have normal wheels

I was told that they currently have four drilling rigs that will be used. Each rig will spend from one to around three months at each site, and will then be move to the next site. To remain on schedule, all core drilling must be complete by the end of next year.

For very remote or difficult sites, where it is not feasible to construct or improve an access road, a helicopter can be used to transport the rig to a site. One thing that the project engineers wanted me to understand was the emphasis on low environmental impact from the drilling operations.

They pointed out an area where drilling had been done earlier, and emphasized that there were no remaining remnants, other than a small cement cap above the core hole, and the jungle had already grown back over the sites. I did notice a small diesel oil slick near the caterpillar tracks of the drilling machine but, other than this one oversight, the area was obviously well maintained.

The diameter of the core hole is only 7 cm, but the depth can reach 300 meters

The diameter of the core hole is only 7 cm,
but the depth can reach 300 meters

Another thing that is emphasized is safety, both of the ICE employees, and the project. In the shelter I saw an emergency “back board” used for immobilizing and transporting an injured person. Also, Sra. Ramírez mentioned the necessity of access to the drilling sites by emergency vehicles, whether by auto or by air.

The drilling crew works from 6am to 6pm and, at night time, there is a security guard at each site to ensure that nothing is mis-handled or removed. This includes the valuable core samples and other materials used at the site such as the explosive charges I mentioned earlier.

After the site tour, we had lunch at a local ranch house where ICE has contracted with the owner to provide meals for the construction and drilling crews. In talking with the rancher, he indicated that the project is a good one, and he has no objection.

From what I understand, this attitude is not shared by all neighbors in the vicinity of the dam, including the family who runs Rafiki Lodge. Perhaps I will make a trip to visit them and then write about their viewpoint.

References

5 Responses to “An Unexpected Visit to PH Savegre”

 

kent from Colorado

May 1st, 2010 – 14:49

Hi Chris,
Very interesting about this project. A question for you before I tell you what I do.

What do you think about it??

I am an engineer (dam engineer, civil, geotechnical). I just wonder how the “local Ticos” think? I am currently working on several of these projects. The one closest to you is the Changuinola Project just over the mountains near Boca Del Toro Panama. If this project actually goes, I will be most likely too old to work on this one. I hope to retire and spend more time in Matapalo within the next 3 years.

Do you know anything about the other planned Hydro Project down near Palmar Norte, Buenos Aries area.

I realy enjoy your site, and if you get to Rifiki Lodge, tell Constance and his lovely wife hello. We met them last time we were in CR. Went down the “Fastest Water Slide in the World”…..after a couple of beers…………

Cheers
Kent Peter
Morrison, Co.
Matapalo, CR.

 

Eileen Mason

May 2nd, 2010 – 00:16

Thanks for your detailed report and for taking the time to go look. Based on what is happening with the high tension lines and how ICE appears to operate, I wouldn’t believe a word of what they say no matter who says it. At the meeting in Rana Roja to which you refer, they mentioned their relatively recent realization that a hydroelectric dam would have an environmental and human impact. I seriously doubt that any impact would deter their plans. While we were happy to host that meeting, we both feel like we were surreptitiously used to promote the dam. Further, if ICE decides to run a tunnel under your property or anyone else’s, they apparently can expropriate and there is NOTHING anyone can do about it except fight for a fair price.

Above, Kent mentioned the Palmar Norte project. If that is the one which is already underway, I have heard (don’t know first hand) that there will be tremendous environmental damage even though ICE claimed damage would be minimal. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that.

Remember too, that ICE had planned to run the high tension lines directly over Matapalo town and closer to the water supply for the town than permitted by law, pretending that high tension lines do no harm to those living under or near them, a convenient lie. If Matapalo is not able to stop the lines, it appears as though at least ICE will now be required to run underground as soon as the lines begin to enter the restricted zone, all because Matapalo chose to fight back.

While ICE may be acting like many other money hungry businesses the world over, it isn’t what Costa Rica is selling to attract investment. Rather, just the opposite.

 

C. Cobb

May 2nd, 2010 - 18:04

Hey Kent,
Thanks for your kind feedback. At this point, to be honest, I’m not exactly sure what to think. Earlier I thought that the PH Savegre project was influencing positioning of the huge SIEPAC high-tension power lines down along the costanera and through Matapalo village. Now I’m not so sure. From an engineering standpoint, SIEPAC and the three hydroelectric projects are separate. However, from a political perspective, someone at some point up the management chain of El ICE is responsible for all of this, and what games they might be playing is anyone’s guess.

If we exclude SIEPAC from consideration, then I now tend to be in favor of PH Savegre (and the other two: PH Pirris near Parrita, and PH Diquis on Rio El General near the Osa). Yes it will impact the environment, but hydroelectric is the best option available to Costa Rica. Once the world-wide economy gets back on track, a lot of development is coming to this area and other parts of Costa Rica, which obviously will require new power sources.

And no, other than the general location, I don’t know any details of the other hydro projects. I understand that PH Pirris is now under construction, but not sure about PH Diquis. It would probably be a good idea to take some field trips and visit those sites to get some idea of what the future reality might look like here.

Now a question for you: What is the benefit of creating a long hydro tunnel and locating the generating plant so far from the dam? Is this to mitigate problems with silting? I read that the huge Three Gorges Dam in China may only have a 70 year lifespan due to silting.

Eileen,
Having worked with a lot of engineers over the years, I think it’s fair to trust what these guys are saying. Generally engineering types get caught up in the project and are not so political. However, I also know that the engineers don’t always know the political reality, and will say what they honestly believe at the time, whether or not that is the eventual outcome due to ‘changes’ in project plans (which may have, at some higher level, been the ‘real’ plan all along).

I know nothing about the SIEPAC project plans. Maybe we can follow up with the offer that José A. Aragon Soto (ICE project director for PH Savegre) made at the Rana Roja meeting to ask representatives from the SIEPAC project to come and visit us.

 

Eileen Mason

May 3rd, 2010 – 22:44

Good idea, Chris. I also think your question to Kent about what is the value of a long tunnel is one which both Joe and I have been asking ourselves and not getting any answer:) Perhaps an expert can now offer some better information.

We have understood that Costa Rica will gain no value from the SIEPAC high tension lines – the power will pass by us. I hope that isn’t true. I can’t believe, however that the two projects aren’t somehow connected because after Costa Rica generates all this power they then must do something with it in order for anyone to use it and it seems sensible to me (not an engineer), to be able to connect to the SIEPAC lines which will be so close to the lovely 4 story generating plant that they will be kissing.

You mentioned to Joe about the proposed tunnel under your property and that you don’t own the mineral rights. Would this right-of-way be considered mineral rights? Is there something I don’t understand?

 

C. Cobb

May 4th, 2010 - 10:42

During the ride back from the dam site, I asked Sr. Viguez about distribution and SIEPAC. He confirmed what I had understood from the meeting last July, that there are three possibilities: Construct new towers and run wires for the three PH projects, run wires for the PH projects on an unused arm of the SIEPAC towers, or connect directly into the SIEPAC wires.

The impresson I got last week is that each of the options has problems. New towers are obviously a big expense, but even using the SIEPAC towers for separate cables would take a lot of politics, bureaucracy, expense, and delays. Trying to plug into SIEPAC wires would require additional effort to monitor the megawatts injected, the distance of the transmission within Costa Rica, and then monitor the MW withdrawn less the amount lost due to resistance in the wires.

As for the tunnel (which, under my house, will likely be at a depth of 80 or 100 meters), I have no say about that. What most people think of as land “ownership” should really be called “license to use.”

In the US, even with so-called fee simple ownership, you don’t own anything but are just renting the right to enjoy some of the benefits. (If you don’t think this is true, just stop paying taxes for a few years.) With fee simple, all you really own is the right to do some small surface improvements, and to transfer the property’s benefits to someone else.

Even fee simple, which in the US includes surface rights and (I believe) usually includes mineral rights and possibly riparian rights, does not include timber rights, commercial development rights (unless specifically zoned for that), agricultural rights (unless zoned), or airspace rights. Even then you need permits to build a house, or simply to add on to one.

In Costa Rica, I believe that ownership includes only surface rights, but even that is limited. You can’t legally cut a tree, drill a well, or build anything to cross a stream without permits. And here you have no say as to what happens beneath your property. If this is wrong, I would really like to see a title document conferring mineral rights here.

Finally, in the US, if you do own mineral rights, for a project like this there is always the eminent domain law which trumps your fee simple rights. Trying to fight City Hall is usually not successful.

Too much info? Sorry…solo mi dos colones,

Leave a Reply

 

September 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories

Archives

Copyright © The Blah Blah Blog. All rights reserved.
Sunset theme is based on Star-Brite by High Impact.